I posted the following comment to the Trib's editorial:

 

The Tribune editorial puts the Bull Mountain project into very clear perspective. Since it is within commuting distance of Billings, most of the jobs and economic impact will benefit that city, and since IGCC doesn't produce harmful pollutants like mercury, acid rain, and particulates which cause asthma, there is very little downside for the local area (although CO2 production will be enormous, and sequestration is very costly and largely unproven).

Not so with the Highwood Station. Our smelter has been closed down for more than 20 years, yet we are only beginning to get out from under the tremendous health and economic consequences of being showered with heavy metals, arsenic, and other pollutants for nearly a century. The same is true of Butte and Anaconda. Lawton's "Big Lie" which the editorial repeats is that the Highwood station is "clean coal". It is marginally cleaner than Colstrip for some pollutants, but at least 80% as bad overall. Add this to our legacy from the smelter, and we have another crushing burden on our ecological and economic future.

Remember what the Highwood Station will produce in the way of pollutants.

Emissions Inventory:

According to the draft Air Quality Permit, the Highwood Power Project would release the following pollutants to the atmosphere:

 

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 443 tons per year

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 944 tons per year

Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1177 tons per year

Particulate Matter (PM-10)* 366 tons per year

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) equivalent** 3,052,081 tons per year

(equivalent to 561,000 cars)

Sulfuric Acid Mist 62 tons per year

Volatile Organic Carbon (VOC) 38 tons per year

Hydrochloric Acid Gas (HCl) 24 tons per year

Hydrofluoric Acid Gas (HF) 20 tons per year

Mercury 40 pounds per year

 

*Note that Particulate Matter includes metals such as Arsenic, Beryllium, Cadmium, Manganese, and 560 pounds of lead.

** Note that the CO2e emissions of this plant represents an increase of 7.5% over ALL sources of greenhouse gases in Montana.

 

It's not an "answer" that much of these pollutants will be blown northeast to contaminate Fort Benton, Havre, and Rocky Boy. Ask the people there what they think about it!

And check the Citizens for Clean Energy website:

www.cce-mt.org

 

Paul Stephens