Article
published May 16, 2007
Lawmakers OK 'clean and green' energy bill
By KARL PUCKETT
Tribune Staff Writer
Big
property-tax breaks for developers that construct clean coal-fired power plants
and transmission lines carrying "clean and green" energy were
approved by Montana lawmakers on the final day of the special session.
"This
is a classic jobs and environment bill," said Evan Barrett, chief business
officer in the governor's office of economic development.
The
builder of a proposed transmission line connecting Great Falls to Lethbridge,
Alberta, will benefit from the bill, but it's too soon to say whether the
developers of a coal-fired power plant proposed east of Great Falls stand to
gain.
Lawmakers
from northcentral Montana predicted the Jobs and Energy Development Incentives
Act would spur construction of new clean coal-fired plants equipped to capture
climate-change-inducing greenhouse gases, as well as new transmission systems
to carry electricity generated from wind farms.
Badly
needed economic development in rural Montana would follow, they said.
"I
believe this is one of the most important bills this legislative session,"
said Sen. Jerry Black, a Republican representing portions of Pondera, Glacier,
Toole, Chouteau and Liberty counties.
Under
the act, permanent tax rates for new transmission lines needed to get clean
power to market would drop 75 percent, from 12 percent of taxable value to 3
percent. Likewise, taxes on pipelines that carry carbon emissions captured at
those facilities to storage sites would drop by the same amount.
Taxes
on the new clean coal-fired plants would be 3 percent under the act, instead of
the current 6 percent.
The
coal-fired Highwood Generating Station, proposed east of Great Falls, would not
qualify for tax breaks, Barrett said. Only plants that "gasify" coal
and capture carbon emissions would be eligible. If Highwood is built, the coal
will be burned, instead of gasified.
However,
Highwood's tax rate would be 3 percent anyway because cooperatives already are
taxed.
However,
plant developer Southern Montana Electric Generation and Transmission still
could benefit if it adds carbon-capture technology to the plant, which it is
exploring. A pipeline carrying captured gases to storage sites could
potentially qualify for the tax break, Barrett said.
The
legislation also includes temporary tax breaks Ñ1.5 percent for 15 years Ñ for
both new clean-technology plants and transmission lines carrying clean power.
Some
landowners who live along the MATL route have complained about the impact it
would have on farming operations. In response, Jones inserted language that
exempts property on 650 feet of either side of the centerline from taxes. The
tax reductions along the entire 130-mile portion of line in Montana would be
$40,000, said Rep. Llew Jones, R-Conrad.
Schweitzer
introduced the initial "clean and green" energy legislation at the
start of the regular session and lawmakers, counties and developers left their
mark on it as it progressed.
Jones,
who carried the bill in the House, said the new tax rates would make Montana
more competitive with Wyoming and the Dakotas in developing both wind and coal
resources.
For
example, current Montana property taxes on a 500-megawatt, clean-technology
power plant with a pipeline and transmission line would be $36 million. With
the new rates in place, taxes would be $16 million on that same facility, Jones
said.
By
comparison, Wyoming taxes on such a power plant would be $10 million, Jones
said.
"We
potentially could become the battery of power for the surrounding area,
including the West Coast," Jones said.
Montana
Alberta Tie Ltd.'s Bob Williams called the passage of the legislation "a
very positive development to our project." During the session, concern
arose that the line might not go forward without the tax break.
The
$120 million MATL line would connect separate electrical grids in Alberta and
Montana. MATL officials say the line could spur up to $1 billion in
transmission and wind-farm construction in northcentral Montana.
"We're
relieved we don't have to speculate on what might have happened," said
Williams, who acknowledged the bipartisan support of the bill.
The bill passed the Senate, 33-17, on Monday night, and the House, 67-27, on Tuesday morning.