Published
on Tuesday, September 11, 2007.
Last modified on 9/11/2007 at 12:36 am
Feds
rule for BNSF in coal rates case
By
The Associated Press
BISMARCK,
N.D. - Federal regulators have ruled in favor of BNSF Railway in a case brought
by Basin Electric Power Cooperative over coal-hauling rates.
The
Bismarck-based electric co-op claimed the railroad is a monopoly that charges
too much to provide substandard service hauling coal to a Wyoming power plant.
The Surface Transportation Board said Monday that Basin "failed to
establish that the challenged rates are unreasonably high."
"We
are deeply discouraged and frustrated," said Mike Eggl, a Basin Electric
senior vice president.
"We're
satisfied with the ruling, and we believe it is fair and correct," BNSF
spokesman Gus Melonas said.
Basin
has been at odds with BNSF over rail service since a 20-year contract to haul 8
million tons of coal annually from the Powder River Basin to the Laramie River
Station power plant expired in 2004. The two sides were unable to negotiate a
contract, and BNSF then set a rate at twice the expired contract rate, or
roughly $6 per ton, to haul the coal about 200 miles to the plant, board
documents say.
Basin,
which filed the complaint against BNSF along with the Western Fuels
Association, claims its costs for shipping coal to the Laramie River Station
plant have doubled and says that will cost utility customers in nine states an
additional $1 billion over the next 20 years.
The
plant produces power for about 2 million consumers in North Dakota, South
Dakota, Colorado, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico and Wyoming.
Basin
officials say the Laramie River Station is a "captive" customer to
the railroad, the only one serving the plant.
The
increased costs to ship the coal will be passed on to Basin's customers, Basin
spokesman Daryl Hill said.
The
board's ruling, released Monday, says it will give Basin a chance to revise its
case in light of changes in the method of allocating revenue since the original
complaint was filed.
Eggl
said Basin is mulling whether to appeal the board's decision.