Article
published Jan 31, 2008
Preservation board seeks protection for L&C landmark
By KARL PUCKETT
Tribune Staff Writer
The
Montana Historic Preservation Review Board is asking Gov. Brian Schweitzer to
protect a nationally recognized Lewis and Clark portage route it contends is
threatened by the proposed Highwood Generating Station.
Both
the coal-fired power plant and the Great Falls Portage National Historic
Landmark are located east of Great Falls.
"We
urge you to take all necessary steps within your power as governor to protect
this important National Historic Landmark," board Chairman H. Rafael
Chacon wrote in a letter to Schweitzer dated Monday.
The
board, which advises the governor and state agencies on preservation issues,
voted 8-1 on Jan. 25 to send the letter. Members thought it was important that
their voice be heard on "a very, very important issue," said Kate
Hampton, coordinator for the State Historic Preservation Office.
Evan
Barrett, the chief business officer in the governor's Office of Economic
Development, said there's little the governor can do administratively at this
point because it is so late in the review process for the power plant.
Tim
Gregori, general manager of Southern Montana Electric Generation &
Transmission, which is the plant's developer, called the move an "attempt
to bolt with the process because it may not necessarily be going the way folks
think it should be going."
A
protocol already exists to discuss mitigating the plant's impact on the portage
route, Gregori said. That process involves consultation between the federal
Rural Utilities Service and historical and government agencies with a stake in
the route.
SME
is working to mitigate the potential visual impacts, including an expensive
shift of the plant to outside the landmark corridor, Gregori said.
The
company, which is a coalition of rural utilities, also is teaming with local
groups to enhance the overall Lewis and Clark experience, Gregori said. He
referenced a recent gift of $5,000 to the Lewis and Clark Interpretive Center
Foundation to purchase private land across the Missouri River from the center
as an example.
The
Great Falls Portage National Historic Landmark highlights an overland,
one-mile-wide corridor explorers Meriwether Lewis and William Clark took around
the falls of the Missouri River in 1805. It was designated a landmark in 1966.
The
main power plant would not be located within the corridor, most of which is
located on private land, but it would be within view of a public interpretive
site. However, wind turbines associated with the facility would be located
within the corridor.
The
state preservation board concluded the landmark designation could be revoked
because of the addition of power lines, wind turbines, roads, rail lines and
the coal-fired portion of the power plant, which it says will "destroy the
sense of place that currently characterizes this cultural resource."
The
Great Falls-Cascade County Historic Preservation Advisory Commission and the
federal Advisory Council for Historic Preservation, which advises Congress,
previously have raised similar concerns.
With
the state board's action, preservation agencies at every level are saying,
"Please don't do this," said Ellen Sievert, the historic preservation
officer for the Great Falls-Cascade County Historic Preservation Program.
In a letter to the preservation board before its vote, Gregori said it is only speculation that the landmark would be delisted if Highwood is built. He pointed out that the landmark corridor already features a high school, junkyard, marina and other development.