Article
published Oct 17, 2007
Energy firm claims it should be first in transmission queue
By JO DEE BLACK
Tribune Business Editor
The
Texas-based company that bought a natural-gas fired electric power plant
project near Great Falls from NorthWestern Energy claims the energy company has
unfairly reassigned its spot in line for a transmission hook up.
Montgomery
Great Falls Energy Partners is asking the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
to require NorthWestern Energy to move its proposed 277-megawatt plant to the
front of the queue to connect into NorthWestern's system. FERC is the federal
agency that regulates interstate transmission of natural gas, oil, and
electricity, as well as natural gas and hydropower projects.
Montgomery
officials say NorthWestern failed to manage the queue and as a result, plans to
bill Montgomery approximately $131 million more than originally estimated to
hook into its transmission lines.
NorthWestern
officials counter that by the time Montgomery submitted an interconnection request,
there were 10 other projects in line.
The
Montgomery complaint adds another chapter to the proposed project's
trouble-filled history.
Montgomery
Energy announced plans to buy what was then called Montana Megawatts in March.
Montana Megawatts was a NorthWestern Energy project originally scheduled to
operate in November 2001, generating 277 megawatts of electricity from
gas-fired and steam-powered turbines. The project stalled after the Montana
Public Service Commission rejected plans to sell the electricity produced as
firming power to NorthWestern's utility arm. Two years later, NorthWestern
filed for bankruptcy and put the project up for sale.
The
principal owner of Montgomery Great Falls Energy, Frank Giacalone, claims that
when his company bought Montana Megawatts, NorthWestern Energy estimated that
it would cost $15 million to connect to transmission lines. Now that estimate
is $146.7 million.
FERC
has yet to rule on the matter; three companies with projects ahead of
Montgomery's request in the transmission queue filed protests to the company's
claims.
Officials
with Southern Montana Electric Generation & Transmission, which plans to
build a 215- to 250-megawatt coal-fired power plant east of Great Falls, said
the claim is without merit. SME's project is the first in the transmission
queue.
"We
do not agree with their (Montgomery) assertions," said Tim Gregori, SME's
chief executive officer.
PPL
Montana and Great Northern Power Development, which plan to build a
500-megawatt coal-fired plant near Circle, are also protesting Montgomery's
claims.
"Montgomery
wants FERC to drop other projects out of the queue and we think that would be
an unfair outcome," said Bill Pascoe of Great Northern Power Development.
Attorneys
for both Montgomery Energy and NorthWestern Energy declined to comment on the
matter because the case is pending before FERC.
Taylor
Cheek, Montgomery's managing director of business development, also declined
comment. However, in July he expressed frustration with NorthWestern Energy and
said his company may consider building its own transmission lines.
"The bottom line is that they (NorthWestern) do not have a good system in place to clean out their transmission queue," Cheek said at the time. "We don't think it's appropriate to pay for improvements for projects that may or may not happen."