March 23,
2005
Manager: Cities can save
with co-op power
Despite a recent
legislative setback, plans are gung-ho to build a coal-fired power plant near Great
Falls to serve residents of that city and customers of five rural electric
co-ops.
The Montana Legislature
recently killed a bill to allow Great Falls to require most residents to buy
power from this plant to supply their homes.
However, Tim Gregori,
general manager of the umbrella organization building the plant, said the city
can accomplish the same thing by convincing residents they'd save money buying
co-op power.
|
|
Gregori heads the Southern
Montana Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative. The SME represents
Great Falls plus five rural electric co-ops with 23,000 members based in
Huntley, Red Lodge, Lewistown, Hysham and Ashland. The cooperatives are
nonprofit companies that sell electricity mostly to rural, sparsely populated
areas.
SME wants to build a
250-megawatt, coal-fired power plant seven miles east of Great Falls. The
plant, called Highwood Station, will cost $515 million and could be operational
by 2010.
This plant should not be confused
with the failed Great Falls natural-gas plant started, then abandoned, by
NorthWestern Energy.
Gregori told more than 600
members at the Yellowstone Valley Electric Cooperative annual meeting in
Billings on Tuesday that SME has made great progress, including:
á Options on the land.
á Installing on-site air monitors.
á Applying for air permits.
á Obtaining bridge or temporary financing.
á Finishing test burns of the coal.
á Completing a loan application that is 23 pounds and growing.
He also told the annual
meeting that SME has enough land to build a second power plant, if needed, for
future growth.
Yellowstone Valley gets 80
percent of its wholesale power from the Bonneville Power Administration that
runs the Pacific West hydropower system, but that power contract begins to wind
down in 2008.
That will thrust the co-op
into buying electricity on the open market, which could get expensive quickly.
"It was cheaper in the
long run for Yellowstone Valley and the other co-ops to build and own than to
go out and buy the power," Gregori said.
Co-ops will be able to keep
costs to their customers down compared to investor-owned utilities, he said,
because utilities that have to make profits have higher borrowing costs and
higher tax rates.
"In addition, they
won't take risks for rural Montana service," he said.
Co-ops have been serving
rural Montana for 60 years or more, Gregori said, and they need to control
their own future.
"Montanans need to
take Montana coal, burn it in a Montana plant and have the benefits stay in
Montana," Gregori said.
Since the breakup of
Montana Power, the state's hydroelectric dams and properties at Colstrip are
owned by PPL Montana, whose parent company is in Pennsylvania.
A subsidiary of MDU
Resources Group is completing a coal-fired plant near Hardin, but that power is
being sold to Canada.
Finally, the never-ending
drought in the Northwest will take another big bite out of utility budgets,
perhaps doubling the costs in the summer, he said.
So, why a plant in Great
Falls, when most of the co-op members live south and east of there?
SME hired a Denver
consultant who determined that the site has the right combination of
transmission lines, water and coal. The site is the same area that Montana
Power Co. chose in the 1980s for a similar plant.
The best coal to fuel the
plant would be from the Decker and Spring Creek mines on the Montana/Wyoming
state line, Gregori said.
That most likely means
transporting coal by rail.
One co-op member told
Gregori that Burlington Northern Santa Fe would be a silent partner in the
project like "a horse and a hare" and could overcharge to the point
of ruining it.
Gregori said they've
anticipated that problem and if the railroad overcharges, SME could build
its own coal mine near Great Falls and use an independent rail line.
Since the Montana
Legislature deregulated electricity and Montana Power Co. disintegrated,
Gregori said, wholesale prices for electricity and natural gas have doubled.
Yellowstone Valley General
Manager Terry Holzer said his co-op increased its rates 5.5 percent last year
and will have a similar increase this year.
"I think it's
responsible for us to raise our rates incrementally rather than hit customers
with 25 percent increase in one year," Holzer said.
Even so, he said YVEC rates
are 7 percent lower than NorthWestern Energy's and YVEC remains the
lowest-priced regional co-op.
Jan Falstad can be
contacted at (406) 657-1306 or at jfalstad@billingsgazette.com.
Copyright © The Billings Gazette, a division of Lee Enterprises.